A Meta-Narrative Review of Isomorphism in Sport Organizations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of sport Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Department of Sport Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Professor of sport Management, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

4 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract

Isomorphism is the process by which organizations become more similar to each other over time. The purpose of this study was to explore how previous research has examined this phenomenon in sports organizations. We used a semi-systematic approach to conduct the research. In conducting and reporting the review we followed the four stages that are outlined by Snyder (2019). A total of 126 articles underwent an abstract review process, from which 26 articles were extracted. Finally, 13 qualitative articles that related to the research objectives were reviewed. We conducted a content analysis of 13 articles on isomorphism in sport. The articles were published in a variety of academic journals between 1990 and 2023. 8 main themes are presented: Type of isomorphism, Mechanism of isomorphism, Consequences of Isomorphism in Sport Organizations, Function of Isomorphism, Strategies for response to pressure, institutional logics, Application of Isomorphism in Sports Organizations, Managing Isomorphism in Sport Organizations. Results showed isomorphism in sport organizations is driven by three primary mechanisms: coercive isomorphism, mimetic isomorphism, and normative isomorphism. In conclusion, isomorphism is a complex phenomenon that can have both positive and negative consequences for sport organizations. By understanding the mechanisms of isomorphism and carefully managing its effects, sport organizations can leverage its benefits while maintaining their strategic autonomy and fostering a culture of innovation and adaptation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abdul Majid, J., Ab Rahim, N., & Razak, R. (2023). Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2266166.
Alyahya, M., Hijazi, H., & Harvey, H. (2018). Explaining the accreditation process from the institutional isomorphism perspective: a case study of Jordanian primary healthcare centers. The International journal of health planning and management, 33(1), 102-120.
Augestad, P., Bergsgard, N. A., & Hansen, A. Ø. (2006). The institutionalization of an elite sport organization in Norway: The case of “Olympiatoppen”. Sociology of sport journal, 23(3), 293-313.
De Bock, T., Scheerder, J., Theeboom, M., Constandt, B., Marlier, M., De Clerck, T., & Willem, A. (2022). Stuck between medals and participation: an institutional theory perspective on why sport federations struggle to reach Sport-for-All goals. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1891.
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., Díaz-Iglesias, S., & Prado-Román, M. (2017). The Institutionalization of Sports Organizations: A Legitimacy Perspective. Sports Management as an Emerging Economic Activity: Trends and Best Practices, 87-99.
Dos Santos, M. G., Borini, F. M., Pereira, R. M., & Raziq, M. M. (2020). Institutional pressures and the diffusion of organisational innovation: Evidence from Brazilian firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 869-880.
Edwards, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Washington, M. (2009). Institutional pressures, government funding and provincial sport organisations. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 6(2), 128-149.
Fahlén, J., & Stenling, C. (2019). (Re) conceptualizing institutional change in sport management contexts: The unintended consequences of sport organizations’ everyday organizational life. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(2), 265-285.
Furusten, S. (2023). Institutional theory and organizational change: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gammelsæter, H. (2010). Institutional pluralism and governance in “commercialized” sport clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(5), 569-594.
Gammelsæter, H., & Solenes, O. (2013). Money in–brains out? Institutional logics affecting athletes’ preparation for alternative careers. European journal for sport and society, 10(3), 267-289.
Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives: Oxford university press.
Heinze, K. L., & Lu, D. (2017). Shifting responses to institutional change: The National Football League and player concussions. Journal of Sport Management, 31(5), 497-513.
Jazairy, A., & von Haartman, R. (2020). Analysing the institutional pressures on shippers and logistics service providers to implement green supply chain management practices. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(1), 44-84.
Jeyaraj, A., & Zadeh, A. (2020). Institutional isomorphism in organizational cybersecurity: A text analytics approach. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 30(4), 361-380.
Joo, S., Larkin, B., & Walker, N. (2017). Institutional isomorphism and social responsibility in professional sports. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 38-57.
Kerlin, J. A., Peng, S., & Cui, T. S. (2021). Strategic responses of social enterprises to institutional pressures in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 14(2), 200-224.
Long, H. A., French, D. P., & Brooks, J. M. (2020). Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 1(1), 31-42.
Luo, L., & Qi, C. (2022). The tendency of terrorist organizations to explosive attacks: An institutional theory perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 747967.
Moreau, D. (2021). Mimetic Isomorphism in Non-Profit Organisations (NPO): Sports Associations in the Nord Pas-De-Calais Departments. Societies, 11(3), 100. doi:10.3390/soc11030100
Morrison, K. A., & Misener, K. E. (2021). Exploring the conditions for strategic planning in nonprofit community sport. Sport Management Review, 24(5), 747-769.
O’Brien, D., & Slack, T. (2004). The emergence of a professional logic in English rugby union: The role of isomorphic and diffusion processes. Journal of Sport Management, 18(1), 13-39.
Paramio-Salcines, J. L., & Kitchin, P. J. (2013). Institutional perspectives on the implementation of disability legislation and services for spectators with disabilities in European professional football. Sport Management Review, 16(3), 337-348.
Pentifallo, C., & VanWynsberghe, R. (2016). Blame it on Rio: Isomorphism, environmental protection and sustainability in the Olympic Movement The'Olympic and Paralympic'Effect on Public Policy (pp. 127-146): Routledge.
Phelps, S., & Dickson, G. (2009). Symbolic isomorphism and legitimacy: New Zealand's Ice Blacks and Ice Fernz. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 5(1-2), 90-100.
Radu, M., Radu, G., Condurache, A., & Purcărea, V. L. (2018). The influence of digital media on the success of a health care unit. Journal of medicine and life, 11(3), 254.
Robbins, S., DeCenzo, D., Coulter, M., & Anderson, I. (2014). Fundamentals of management (7th Canadian ed.): Toronto: Pearson.
Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization studies, 15(6), 803-827.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2009). The order of logics in Swedish sport–feeding the hungry beast of result orientation and commercialization. European journal for sport and society, 6(2), 121-134.
Strittmatter, A.-M., & Skille, E. Å. (2017). Boosting youth sport? Implementation of Norwegian youth sport policy through the 2016 Lillehammer Winter Youth Olympic Games. Sport in society, 20(1), 144-160.
Suykens, B., George, B., De Rynck, F., & Verschuere, B. (2021). Determinants of non-profit commercialism. Resource deficits, institutional pressures or organizational contingencies? Public management review, 23(10), 1456-1478.
Washington, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2008). Institutional contradictions and struggles in the formation of US collegiate basketball, 1880–1938. Journal of Sport Management, 22(1), 30-49.
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Meta‐narrative reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(5), 987-1004.
Zhao, W., & Ge, J. (2023). Different while being similar: The dual institutional process and differential organizational status. The British Journal of Sociology, 74(2), 241-258.
Zheng, W., Ni, N., & Crilly, D. (2023). Channeling and dampening: The role of political ties in information disclosure and concealment. Plos one, 18(7), e0289016.
Journal of New Studies in Sport Management
Volume 5, Issue 3
September 2024
Pages 1199-1212

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics