The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on Organizational Performance with the Mediating Role of Ambidexterity and Digital Platforms in Tehran Municipality Sports Organization

Document Type : Original Article


1 Associate Professor, Department of Sport sciences, University of Qom. Qom, Iran.

2 MSc, Department of Sport sciences, University of Qom. Qom, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Sport sciences, University of Qom. Qom, Iran


Dynamic environments provide sports organizations with various threats and opportunities for optimization and development. This study aims to examine the effect of dynamic capabilities on organizational performance with the mediating role of ambidexterity and digital platforms in the Tehran Municipality Sports Organization. This practical, developmental, and quantitative study was conducted at the Tehran Municipal Sports Organization in Iran. A total of 213 questionnaires were obtained through Google Forms and the data analysis was conducted using SPSS26 and Smart PLS version 4. This study highlights the importance of digital platforms and ambidexterity mediators in the relationship between dynamic capabilities and organizational performance. It also addresses the lack of an effect of technological and market turbulence on the relationship between ambidextrous capabilities and performance. Finally, suggestions for future research are presented.


Main Subjects

Abidemi, B. T., Halim, F. B., & Alshuabi, A. I. (2017). Market orientation and Organizational Performance: A proposed model on the moderating Effect of Technological Turbulence. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(6), 111-117.
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Allahyari, M., Mirzazadeh, Z., Keshtidar, M., & Malekzadeh, G. (2022). Determining the Effective Factors on Reviewing Appropriate Organizational Structure for Physical Education Organizations in Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, 14(1), 95-106.
Baía, E. P., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and performance: how has the relationship been assessed? Journal of Management & Organization, 1-30.
Barney, J. B., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: toward an organizationally‐based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 15(S1), 5-9.
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of management, 36(1), 256-280.
Bashir, M., Naqshbandi, M. M., & Farooq, R. (2020). Business model innovation: a systematic review and future research directions. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(4), 457-476.
Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, 58(4), 36-58.
Björkdahl, J. (2020). Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing firms. California Management Review, 62(4), 17-36.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation (London, Tavistock Publications). BurnsThe Management of Innovation1961.
Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021). AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research. Journal of Business Research, 127, 85-95.
Cai, W., Wu, J., & Gu, J. (2021). From CEO passion to exploratory and exploitative innovation: the moderating roles of market and technological turbulence. Management Decision, 59(6), 1363-1385.
Chadee, D., Ren, S., & Tang, G. (2021). Is digital technology the magic bullet for performing work at home? Lessons learned for post COVID-19 recovery in hospitality management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102718.
Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Fynes, B., Wiengarten, F., & Lecuna, A. (2015). Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 157-171.
Chou, C., Yang, K.-P., & Chiu, Y.-J. (2018). Managing sequential ambidexterity in the electronics industry: roles of temporal switching capability and contingent factors. Industry and Innovation, 25(8), 752-777.
Correia, R. J., Dias, J. G., & Teixeira, M. S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantages as mediator variables between market orientation and business performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(2), 187-206.
de la Boutetière, H., Montagner, A., & Reich, A. (2018). Unlocking success in digital transformations. McKinsey & Company, 29.
Deng, P., Liu, Y., Gallagher, V. C., & Wu, X. (2020). International strategies of emerging market multinationals: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(4), 408-425.
Ehsani, M., Saffari, M., Amiri, M., & Kozechian, H. (2016). Designing the Model of Sport for all in Iran. Sport Management Studies, 6(27), 87-108.
Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of management, 43(1), 200-227.
Gerke, A., Dickson, G., & Wohlgemuth, V. (2022). Strategic processes in Australian golf clubs: a dynamic capabilities view. European Sport Management Quarterly, 22(6), 727-746.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5-6), 320-340.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European business review.
Harris, S. J., Metzger, M. L., & Duening, T. N. (2021). Innovation in national governing bodies of sport: investigating dynamic capabilities that drive growth. European Sport Management Quarterly, 21(1), 94-115.
Hazen, B. T., Bradley, R. V., Bell, J. E., In, J., & Byrd, T. A. (2017). Enterprise architecture: A competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 566-577.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path (Vol. 7, pp. 91-102): Sage publications Sage UK: London, England.
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research policy, 47(8), 1391-1399.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Herold, S., Heller, J., Rozemeijer, F., & Mahr, D. (2022). Dynamic capabilities for digital procurement transformation: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management(ahead-of-print).
Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of management, 40(7), 1899-1931.
Jadidi, S., Labibi, M., & ghadimi, B. (2021). Sociological components of identity and its impact on health and public sports (Case study of Tehran's 14th district). Razi Journal of Medical Sciences, 28(2), 93-103.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2022). Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, 118, 102218.
Jucevičius, G., & Jucevičienė, R. (2022). Enabling collaborative dynamic capabilities in strategic communities: Firm-vs. network-centric perspectives. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 587-604.
Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European business review, 28(4), 431-448.
Kittikumpanat, M. (2021). A Conceptualized Model of Digital Transformation for Sport Organization in Thailand. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 2270-2276.
Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 104, 380-392.
Korhonen, J. J., & Halén, M. (2017). Enterprise architecture for digital transformation. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).
Lee, O.-K., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398-417.
Lucassen, J. M., & Bakker, S. d. (2016). Variety in hybridity in sport organizations and their coping strategies. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(1), 75-94.
Lukito, D., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. (2022). Transformation Management Capabilities for Digital Transformation Initiatives: A Construct Conceptualization in Alignment with the Dynamic Capabilities Framework. Journal of Organizational Management Studies.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
Mariani, M. M., Machado, I., & Nambisan, S. (2023). Types of innovation and artificial intelligence: A systematic quantitative literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113364.
Markovich, A., Raban, D. R., & Efrat, K. (2022). Tailoring competitive information sources to the sequence of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 480-501.
Möller, K., Schmid, F., Seehofer, T. M., & Wenig, P. (2022). How the design of an organizational context helps to attain contextual ambidexterity. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 1-27.
Morgan, N. A., & Piercy, N. F. (1998). Interactions between marketing and quality at the SBU level: influences and outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 190-208.
Nebuloni, G., Hernandez, D., & Carter, P. (2019). IDC Servitization Barometer: Charting Your Path to New Revenue Streams. IDC, London.
Nori, D., Shabani, G., & Soleymani, M. (2021). The effect of Organizational Functional Virtualization on Organizational Sustainability Mediated by the Increase of Human Capital and Organizational Micro in Tehran Municipality Sports Organization. Applied Research in Sport Management, 9(4), 131-146.
Nowy, T., Wicker, P., Feiler, S., & Breuer, C. (2015). Organizational performance of nonprofit and for-profit sport organizations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(2), 155-175.
O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
Oduro, S., & Alsharif, A. H. (2022). Organisational ambidexterity and social enterprise performance: A Ghanaian perspective. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), 13.
Okano, M. T., Santos, H. d. C. L. d., & Ursini, E. L. (2022). The digital platform as digital innovation: A study from the perspective of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 19(03), 2140014.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you: WW Norton & Company.
Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice. International journal of information systems and project management, 5(1), 63-77.
Patel, N. (2015). 90% Of Startups Fail: Here's What You Need To Know About The 10%[Electronic resource]. Forbes: Business and Financial Magazine [Digital edition].–2014.–January, 16th.–Mode of access: http://www. forbes. com/sites/neilpatel/2015/01/16/90-of-startups-will-fail-heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-10/# 1737bedd55e1.
Ratten, V. (2022). Digital platform usage amongst female sport technology entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 1-24.
Rialti, R., Marzi, G., Ciappei, C., & Busso, D. (2019). Big data and dynamic capabilities: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Management Decision, 57(8), 2052-2068.
Robinson, L. (2006). Customer expectations of sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(1), 67-84.
Rodríguez, R., Svensson, G., & Mehl, E. J. (2020). Digitalization process of complex B2B sales processes–Enablers and obstacles. Technology in Society, 62, 101324.
Sadeqi-Arani, Z., & Alidoust Ghahfarokhi, E. (2022). Sports business resilience in the COVID-19 crisis: The delphi qualitative approach. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 15(1), 69-84.
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of marketing, 58(1), 46-55.
Soldatenko, M. (2021). Dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities, digital platform capabilities and operational digital ambidexterity: Examining the impact of DEAC on organizational performance through digital platform capabilities and operational digital ambidexterity. Open Universiteit Nederland.  
Szczepaniak, M. (2020). Public sport policies and health: comparative analysis across European Union countries. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20, 1022-1030.
Tariq, E., Alshurideh, M., Akour, I., & Al-Hawary, S. (2022). The effect of digital marketing capabilities on organizational ambidexterity of the information technology sector. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(2), 401-408.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of international business studies, 45, 8-37.
Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202-216.
Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Teece, D. J. (2018a). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359-368.
Teece, D. J. (2018b). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research policy, 47(8), 1367-1387.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Trieu, H. D., Van Nguyen, P., Nguyen, T. T., Vu, H. M., & Tran, K. (2023). Information technology capabilities and organizational ambidexterity facilitating organizational resilience and firm performance of SMEs. Asia Pacific Management Review.
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29.
Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: Interactions between external and emergent processes and strategic choice. Research in organizational behavior, 8(1), 171-222.
Tushman, M. L., & Smith, W. (2017). Organizational technology. The Blackwell companion to organizations, 386-414.
Van de Wetering, R., & Dijkman, J. (2021). Enhancing digital platform capabilities and networking capability with EA-driven dynamic capabilities. Paper presented at the 27th Americas Conference on Information Systems: Digital Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
van Lieshout, J. W., van der Velden, J. M., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities and open innovation: a conceptual model towards a competitive advantage. European Journal of Management Studies, 26(2/3), 39-62.
Varmus, M., Kubina, M., Boško, P., & Mičiak, M. (2022). Application of the perceived popularity of sports to support the sustainable management of sports organizations. Sustainability, 14(3), 1927.
Veisten, K., Flügel, S., Ramjerdi, F., & Minken, H. (2011). Cycling and walking for transport: Estimating net health effects from comparison of different transport mode users' self-reported physical activity. Health economics review, 1, 1-9.
Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares (Vol. 201): Springer.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
Wetering, R. v. d. (2019). Dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities: conceptualization and validation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business Information Systems.
Witschel, D., Baumann, D., & Voigt, K.-I. (2022). How manufacturing firms navigate through stormy waters of digitalization: The role of dynamic capabilities, organizational factors and environmental turbulence for business model innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 681-714.
Zeimers, G., Anagnostopoulos, C., Zintz, T., & Willem, A. (2019). Organisational learning for corporate social responsibility in sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(1), 80-101.
Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 731-747.